Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal https://epbj-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/epbj <p>The purpose of the Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal (ELPBJ) is to help policymakers in advancing their knowledge and understanding of a variety of policies in learning through a focus of high-quality briefs. The briefs may be about existing policies or may inform new policy based on research. Additionally, there may be comparative analyses published related to policy.</p> <p>The editors welcome contributions from state, national, and international scholars. The criteria for acceptance of briefs are that they are analytical or critical, contribute to policy in the field, and are accessible to state, national, or international policymakers.</p> <p>The editors welcome submissions on timely issues confronting education at all levels. In contrast to a standard research publication, the peer refereed ELPBJ (ISSN 2473-6570) aims to provide highly accessible and user-friendly information to policymakers, practitioners, interest groups, researchers, and more on a variety of pressing educational issues. As the name implies, the ELPBJ invites rich and coherent overviews/analyses of relevant legal and or policy topics.</p> <p> </p> Education Leadership Research Center, Texas A&M University en-US Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal 2473-6570 <p>The ELPBJ is an open access journal which is a social justice and social responsiblity that we as editors and founders are committed to uphold. Therefore, as open access, the author retains the copyright for his/her copyright.</p><p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> Vengeful Equity: Gendering the School-to-Prison Pipeline https://epbj-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/epbj/article/view/1 <p>The ‘school-to prison pipeline’ problem has typically been framed as predominantly affecting boys since punitive school discipline practices become firmly entrenched in U.S. public schools beginning in the 1990’s. Since then, the experiences of girls and gender non-conforming students has largely been overlooked. Girls and gender non-conforming students represent an increasing number of students suspended from schools annually and the number of juvenile justice involved girls has increased. This policy brief presents context to the problem and suggests a gendered analysis of aggression and violence is warranted to identify differences in the ways girls’ and gender non-conforming students’ behaviors are perceived and punished in schools utilizing intersectionality as an analytic tool of critical praxis to provide researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners recommendations for future empirical study and practical approaches to correct policy and practice that perpetuate gender bias and social inequality. Improved policy and practice that address inequitable application of school discipline decision-making and juvenile justice decisions can have a direct effect on girls’ and gender non-conforming students’ academic success and decrease the number of women incarcerated across the United States.</p> Hollie Mackey Copyright (c) 2022 Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal 2022-10-03 2022-10-03 2 1 15 28 10.21423/epbj-v2.a1 Opportunity outside the City: Understanding and Promoting Equity in Rural Schools https://epbj-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/epbj/article/view/16 <p>Recent times have not always been kind to rural places. A persistent decline in<br>manufacturing and agricultural sectors has hallowed out the economic base of many rural towns,<br>leaving diminished prospects and casting a cloud of poverty over large swaths of the rural<br>landscape. A divergent recovery from the Great Recession, during which gains were made but<br>not evenly so across place or economic strata, has in some ways obscured this fact. The reality is<br>that politics, power, and populations increasingly reside in metropolitan centers, and many rural<br>dwellers are at risk of being left behind in tomorrow’s society. Few things could underscore this<br>point more than our nation’s recent election, an unprecedented event in which working class<br>voters made clear that concerns about limited opportunity outside the city must be taken<br>seriously.<br>But in many ways, these voters have been sold a bill of goods. Those who yearn for a<br>return to the good old days, where 20th Century jobs will allow 21st Century rural communities to<br>prosper, are likely to remain yearning: returns to education are now higher than ever, while the<br>industries that used to support rural areas are forecasted to decline over the next decade. The<br>true chance for rural places to thrive once again lies more in innovation and adaptation than it<br>does in a revisiting old stomping grounds. Standing at the nexus of rural children and their<br>opportunities for future success lies public education.</p> Douglas Gagnon Copyright (c) 2023 Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal 2023-02-21 2023-02-21 2 1 Districts of Innovation: A Policy Brief of the Latest Effort to Re/Empower Local Control of Texas Public Schools https://epbj-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/epbj/article/view/22 <p>Local school boards have long been considered “a key<br>mechanism in the mutually dependent relationship<br>between education and democracy” (Resnick &amp; Bryant,<br>2008, pg. 2), so much so that local control of public<br>schools is valued by over half of Americans who believe<br>that control authority should rest with locally-elected<br>school boards (Bushaw &amp; Calderon, 2016). Yet, through<br>decades of standards, accountability and test-reforms<br>championed as a means for schools to achieve equity<br>and improve student and teacher performance, local<br>school boards gradually yielded policy-making discretion<br>to federal and state legislatures, businesses, and<br>bureaucracies (Erickson, 2014; Fusarelli, 2009;<br>Hadderman, 1988).</p> Lynn Hemmer Copyright (c) 2023 Education Law and Policy Briefs Journal 2023-02-21 2023-02-21 2 1